Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:00

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sorting Out Long COVID Symptoms in Babies - Medscape
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Stock futures rise after Trump says Iran-Israel ceasefire is in effect: Live updates - CNBC
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Anne Wojcicki’s nonprofit reaches deal to acquire 23andMe - TechCrunch
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What are James Potter's flaws?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Why aren't you a Trump supporter?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs is facing trial — and these eccentric sketch artists - The Washington Post
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
Will Ferrell Developing ‘Eurovision’ Movie Into Broadway Musical - The Hollywood Reporter